Today, I have been considering how perceptions of history have been distorted by the film world. Obviously, Hollywood has been the recent major Western culprit, albeit not in the same class as Eisenstein or Riefenstahl. However, the aim has been the same. To provide a political message in an entertaining setting that doesn’t ask too many questions of the viewer. As such, the viewer’s idea of history will be shaped by the filmmaker.
I’ve long been interested why history has been distorted, and as I’ve gotten older, tend to believe that this is not to allow a more enjoyable film but rather to ‘educate’ the viewer who will then unconsciously adopt the same viewpoint as the filmmaker.
John Wayne’s ‘Green Berets’ was the only major mainstream film to support the US troops in Vietnam, and was funded by himself in attempt to balance all the negativity emanating from Hollywood. More recently, we have seen Mel Gibson take part and finance projects for, what many consider, ‘vehicles’ by which he was able to express his anti-British and anti-Semitic views. Even more recently, we have seen two films (King Arthur and The Kingdom of Heaven), which I actually enjoyed by the way, distort social history by suggesting that Christians were generally venal and that the other side were generally justified and noble freedom fighters.
So, what has brought this particular post on? An interesting article in USA Today, on the new Hollywood historical drama 'September Dawn', as it happens. The link is:
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/08/hollywoods-terr.htmlThe article expresses many of the concerns that I generally feel, and also raises a number of unanswered questions. Fortunately, the images portrayed by this latest Hollywood offering are for US citizens to ponder upon, as we have enough to worry about over here, without visiting the possible 'sins of the father' on Mitt Romney and his Presidential campaign. It is unlikely to prove a box office success over here!